global warming

Firstly, I do not disagree that the Earth’s temperature is rising. I do disagree that it is being caused by carbon dioxide emissions created by humans. Consider this article in the context of a court presentation. To convict someone you need to be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the allegation is true. Beyond a reasonable doubt.

If there is any doubt that humans are directly altering the latent temperature of the planet then all of the taxation, depopulation and energy price schemes that are being pushed through are being done because of another reason.

The main thrust of this hysteria about man-made global warming stems from the UN IPCC report. In order to give their report credibility to the ignorant masses, the UN frequently mentions that large majority of scientists endorse the report.

This is a lie.

Majority Of Scientists Do Not Support Man Made Warming Theory

…Of 528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers “implicit” endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no “consensus.”

The introduction and the summary of the IPCC’s report was written entirely by politicians under the mandate of the UN, the input of actual scientists was minimal. In addition, all sections that were written by selected scientists were edited to comply with the report summary.

Some of the scientists involved even admitted that the IPCC models failed to accurately predict climate change and that “none of the climate states in the models corresponds even remotely to the current observed climate”.

MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING – IS POLITICS NOT SCIENCE

…Nor are the purveyors of panic giving much notice to the scientists like Dr. Chris Landsea who in his own words, resigned from the IPCC because:

“I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.”

There is PLENTY of doubt about the IPCC report, they are just not reporting it to you. Why? This is even more clear to see when you consider that although most people do not believe in the man made global warming hype the UN and the governments are pushing ahead with these taxes, restrictions and regulations anyway.

The temperature of the Earth has oscillated since it formed, over 4.5 billion years ago. As recently as the seventies, there was the global cooling hysteria which had its proponents screaming from the rooftops about how the Earth was entering into a new ice age, billions are going to die etc.

This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000. — Lowell Ponte “The Cooling”, 1976

If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder by the year 2000…This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age. — Kenneth E.F. Watt on air pollution and global cooling, Earth Day (1970)

That did not stick. So they left it for a few decades and now they are trying to push a new flavour of climate change. Why?

Because the global warming subject is a catalyst for globalists and other elitists to push for sweeping changes to the social, industrial and legal structure of the world. A common fear to scare the global population into acquiescence…

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” – Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in “A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind”, by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5

Now, we have established that the Earth is warming, but why? What can contribute to the rise of this global temperature if it isn’t humans breathing or cows farting?

Before we answer that question, we should take a quick look at basic thermodynamics (which are the laws that govern the behaviour of energy and entropy in a system.) Hot objects emit more energy than they absorb. Cold objects absorb more energy than they emit. That is about as basic as it gets. You can prove this with an experiment at home. Put some water in an ice tray and pop it in the freezer. After a while it will freeze. Obviously. Thermodynamically the freezer is essentially a form of energy vacuum, because it is designed to stay cold (absorb more than it emits) by channeling energy (heat) away from the freezer. The energy level of the water drops as it constantly emits more than it absorbs. The ambient energy level of the freezer is below water’s freezing point, so the energy of the water can drop so low that the water freezes.

Now, take the ice out and put it in a hot oven and you can literally watch the ice melt before your eyes. Why? Well it is the same as the above, but in reverse. Now the system has more energy than the ice. The ice absorbs more than it emits. Its temperature rises until the H2O molecules have enough energy to break the lattice in the ice, and it becomes water again. If it is hot enough, the water will heat up, absorbing more and more energy, eventually boiling off and becoming steam. Steam is a very high energy form of water.

I think we can all agree that this is basic common sense. You wouldn’t stick an ice cube in an oven and come back 30 seconds later to find the inside of the oven looking like Santa’s Grotto. Ever.

Now that is out of the way, lets look at the main source of energy in the solar system.

The Sun.

There is a reason why it is called the Solar System, and that is because the Sun dominates it in every single possible way. Let establish this with some interesting facts about our local mega-ball of plasma.

The sun contains over 99.5% of the mass of the entire solar system.
The sun is over 1 million times bigger than the Earth. Click here for a comparative graphic.
In a single second, the sun generates enough energy to supply all U.S. energy needs for 9,000,000 years.
Global human energy consumption per year = Solar output of less than 1.5 millionths of a second.*
One second of solar output = More than 800,000 years of human energy needs.
The sun is about 92 million miles away. Click here for a comparative graphic. Using the fastest production car ever built, the gorgeous SSC Aero travelling at 256.15 miles per hour, it would take you over 350,000 years.

Reading those facts, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise to read this:

“Solar energy is energy from the Sun. This energy drives climate and the weather supports virtually all life on Earth.” — Solar energy, Wikipedia.

Now, back to thermodynamics. Let’s say that the solar output goes up. We would expect to see the effects of this throughout the solar system, ‘global warming’ on other planets if you will.

Well, the solar output has been increasing. An obvious effect of the sun getting hotter would be other planets exhibiting signs of global warming. Like Mars, for instance.

Look to Mars for the truth on global warming

The sun’s increased irradiance over the last century, not C02 emissions, is responsible for the global warming we’re seeing, says the celebrated scientist, and this solar irradiance also explains the great volume of C02 emissions.

“It is no secret that increased solar irradiance warms Earth’s oceans, which then triggers the emission of large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. So the common view that man’s industrial activity is a deciding factor in global warming has emerged from a misinterpretation of cause and effect relations.”

How about Jupiter?

May 2006: Jupiter’s Great Red Spot is a swirling storm seen for over 300 years, since the beginning of telescopicChristopher Go noticed it had been joined by Red Spot Jr – formed as smaller whitish oval-shaped storms merged and then developed the remarkable reddish hue. This sharp Hubble Space Telescope image showing the two salmon-colored Jovian storms was recorded in April. About half the size of the original Red Spot, Red Spot Jr. is similar in diameter to planet Earth. Seen here below and left of the ancient storm system, it trails the Great Red Spot by about an hour as the planet rotates from left to right. While astronomers still don’t exactly understand why Jupiter’s red spots are red, they do think the appearance of Red Spot Jr. provides evidence for climate change on the Solar System’s ruling gas giant.

SUV’s On Jupiter?

Global warming has finally been explained: the Earth is getting hotter because the Sun is burning more brightly than at any time during the past 1,000 years, according to new research.

The simple fact is that throughout the ages the earth has swung wildly between a warm, wet, stable climate, to a cold, dry and windy one – long before the first fossil fuel was burned. The changes we are now witnessing are a walk in the park compared to the battering that our planet has taken in the past.

This is not a defense of the oil cartels or the Neo-Con wreckers, who would have every motivation to ignore global warming whether it is man-made or not.